Thursday, August 1, 2013

The Big Hit: The Wall Street Journal for Builder Homesite, Inc. (BHI)

Bookmark and ShareBy: Kim Tillinghast, Vice President, Edelman Austin

Edelman supports a national initiative to shift consumer preference toward new homes versus existing homes for client Builder Homesite, Inc. (BHI), a consortium of 27 of the nation’s largest home builders. Builders Design Experience (BDX) is BHI’s builder-facing, marketing and technology services arm.

In an effort to elevate CEO Tim Costello and BHI as the voice of the category, Edelman cultivated a relationship with Wall Street Journal real estate reporter Dawn Wotapka, offering Costello and consortium builders as spokespeople. During an October media trip to New York, Edelman arranged an in-person meeting between Wotapka and Costello, positioning Costello as a key industry resource and tying in the recently-released September Census data on new home sales. They hit it off immediately, and Costello lent insight and resources to a number of trends Wotapka was researching for potential stories.

Upon learning that Wotapka would be attending the 2013 International Builders’ Show in Las Vegas, the building industry’s largest trade show, Edelman reached out in January to arrange a second meeting. Her schedule was packed, but Edelman managed to track her down  and she and Costello spoke at length about a number of topics and trends. When talk turned to the business of upgrades, Edelman arranged an in-booth demonstration of the Envision product, an online design center. Back on home turf, we continued the conversation with Wotapka, granting her site access, statistics and examples.

Ultimately, the story landed on the front page of the Mansion section in print, as well as online, and according to Wotapka, Costello’s insight provided “a really strong paragraph that the story needed.”

The full article can be found here

Media Lessons from the Snowden Case

Bookmark and ShareBy: Phil Gomes, Senior Vice President, Edelman Digital

“There are no secrets,” podcasting pioneer Adam Curry once said. “Only information you do not yet have.”

Opinions vary widely regarding the case of Edward Snowden, the former contractor with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) who has leaked information about U.S. intelligence practices and operations. This has surfaced interesting commentary about the nature of journalism and media today, especially in a world where leaks and other high-profile events move quickly and have far greater impact than just a few years ago. Below are five of the many topics the Snowden case has brought to the fore.

1. Journalist or Advocate?
Snowden was shrewd in trusting The Guardian’s Glenn Greenwald (and, later, others) with his story. Greenwald has a long history of covering civil liberties issues. This has forced some to question the boundary between “advocacy” and “journalism.” Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi wonders if there’s any boundary at all, “To pretend there's such a thing as journalism without advocacy is just silly; nobody in this business really takes that concept seriously. Objectivity is a fairy tale invented purely for the consumption of the credulous public, sort of like the Santa Claus myth. Obviously, journalists can strive to be balanced and objective, but that's all it is, striving.”

2. Do Journalists “Aid and Abet” Leakers? 
A journalist’s job, generically speaking, is to find compelling (and, hopefully, previously undisclosed) facts that are in the public interest, give them context and deliver them to an interested public. Many times, that public interest involves information deemed secret. The famous Pentagon Papers case comes to mind when discussing the Snowden case, as that scandal’s central figure will waste no time in reminding you. In an interview on Meet the Press, host David Gregory even asked Glenn Greenwald if he felt he should be charged with a crime for his stories based on Snowden’s leaks. CNBC’s Aaron Ross Sorkin expressed a similar sentiment, for which he later apologized. Gregory did not.

3. How Can I Keep This From Happening To Me?
In a world where a 64GB memory card can fit atop your pinky nail, companies are very interested in making sure data doesn’t “walk.” In an article discussing ways to help prevent a Snowden-style leak, Slashdot’s Business Intelligence channel says, more or less, that data retention requirements are at least part of the issue, “Is insider risk really such a hopeless case? The problem is that organizations are suffering from data overload. With organizations forced to store and manage untold amounts of raw data on a daily basis, it’s easier than ever for malicious insiders to take their sweet time planning and implementing an attack, and cover their tracks afterwards.”

4. A Free Press Sometimes Means the Right to Miss the Point
In a post-revelation chat session on The Guardian, Snowden expressed dismay that the need to amplify an already sensational story meant that his message was getting lost. 

Tikkamsala: So far are things going the way you thought they would regarding a public debate? 

Snowden: Initially I was very encouraged. Unfortunately, the mainstream media now seems far more interested in what I said when I was 17 or what my girlfriend looks like rather than, say, the largest program of suspicionless [sic] surveillance in human history.

5. The “Blogger versus Journalist” Debate
For as long as I’ve been looking at the intersection between social media and journalism (which is a while now), people have twisted themselves into rhetorical knots as to whether “blogging” is “journalism.”  In discussing the David Gregory interview of Glenn Greenwald mentioned above, PaidContent’s Mathew Ingram asks, “Would Gregory have made those comments if someone from the New York Times was on the show talking about a major investigative report? Unlikely. Greenwald is seen as fair game in part because he isn’t a traditional journalist, but rather someone who started as a blogger, and also because he has an obvious point of view.”

Political blogger Andrew Sullivan — who recently left a traditional media outlet to run his own standalone site — said in a post about the interview that underlying Gregory’s questions was the mainstream media’s “fear and loathing and envy of the blogger journalist.”

The Snowden debate has very wide implications, not the least of which are the applicability of “shield laws,” or laws that give journalists the right to withhold the identity of sources. 

Digital Insight: Storytelling with Data


Bookmark and ShareBy: Brittany Dow, Account Manager, Edelman Toronto

Humans are visual creatures and can absorb information faster when it’s presented that way. Below are five tips that will improve your ability to present data in a visual manner and process information more effectively.

1. Big Data
We’ve all heard the term “Big Data” and that it’s on the rise. The challenge is how to synthesize that information and turn it into something meaningful. It’s no longer the rise of data, but the rise of the dataviz expert. This is a skillset in increasing demand, which has led to the development of new courses, new books and new thought-leaders

2. Data Visualization
Why Visualization? Why not send your data in a table across several slides? After all, that’s what many executives are used to, right? Not necessarily. Data visualization is effective because the human brain is built to consume visual images faster than text.  For example, our brains are designed to identify patterns and create meaning out of those images simultaneously. When approaching data and considering how to present it, keep the Gestalt Principles in mind:  similarity, figure/ground, continuation, closure, proximity and alignment.

3. Work Towards Objectives
Before you begin to chart or sketch a design, ask yourself: What do I want people to understand with this information? Clearly defined objectives are essential to building a successful visualization. 

“A visualization is a tool and, as any other tool, its form (or forms) need to be adapted to its functions.”
-Alberto Cairo, The Functional Art

4. Represent the Data Effectively
Picking the right chart is dependent on the objective and what you’re looking to do with your data. Are you looking to make a comparison? Identify trends over time? These questions will dictate the type of chart or visual approach you choose. For example, comparing and ranking volume of conversation between different influencers is best displayed by a bar graph because it allows you to perceive differences without reading the numbers that accompany them. 

5. Create a Narrative
Developing the story and producing a final product involve editing and curating, adding effective titles, providing context and building a narrative around the data. Once the data is charted, begin designing a layout that takes the reader through a visual narrative based on the objective.

An Ethical Framework for Sponsored Content


Bookmark and ShareBy: Steve Rubel, Chief Content Strategist, Edelman New York

Edelman’s Chief Content Strategist Steve Rubel was recently interviewed by Bob Garfield of NPR’s ‘On the Media’ about ethically approaching sponsored content. According to Rubel, the main point to keep in mind when working in paid media is to be very transparent about paid versus earned content. Find the full interview below and on OntheMedia.org.

BOB GARFIELD:  Sponsored content is something that's been around for as long as we've had media that need paying for. If you’ve ever watched a television infomercial or read a special advertising section in a fashion magazine, you too have consumed a bit of sponsored content, lately referred to as “native advertising.” And as the news industry continues to struggle for dollars, you will, no doubt, be seeing more and more native advertising alongside the news. This is potentially dangerous territory, as sponsored content is often made to resemble actual content as much as possible.

Steve Rubel is chief content strategist at Edelman, the global public relations firm. He’s authored a new report addressing these very murky public relationships. Remember the uproar earlier this year over a sponsored post about scientology on The Atlantic website? Rubel says he knows why that native advertising puff piece was so jarring. It was in the wrong environment.

STEVE RUBEL:  We had this self-serving positive piece that was next to very thoughtful debate, scholarly sometimes, discourse, and, and it just wasn’t the right fit. It was too distant from what the editorial formats are there already. Now, if it was the Church of Scientology trying to shape a debate around an issue and they had multiple points of view and they basically funded the piece of content and had their, their viewpoint along with others in that mix, I think it would have been a better fit.

BOB GARFIELD:  You describe in your report a number of different ways that branded content or sponsored content can manifest itself. Can you tick down the list of ways that this can be accomplished?

STEVE RUBEL:  So the first is what we’re calling syndication. That is like the scientology example. It is like the advertorial reinvented, where you’re in a site that has a bunch of news articles and somewhere in the middle of that list is a piece of content that the brand or one of their agencies create that sits in that mix. We’re not sure about the long-term viability of that particular format. We think that people will skip over it. They see a piece sponsored content, that might mean don't read.

The second we’re calling integration, and that's the product placement format that worked on TV, reinvented for the Web. We've had one publisher say, we do a list of 10 things you need to know about today. Number 11 could be from you, the sponsor. It’s ideally created in the spirit of what's already on that site. BuzzFeed is one of the more advanced companies here. Their entire business model is to create these many sponsored listicles, if you will, list articles.

BOB GARFIELD:  There is a third category of paid content, paid co-creation. What’s that?

STEVE RUBEL:  That’s actually the cleanest one. That's where a media company wants to have a vertical in an area, say, about the future of business or about family travel, but they don't have the money to cover it. So they will create a special section that isn’t just a one-off, but would live on, on a regular basis. The marketer basically commits, to some degree, to fund that. The media company commits a editorial person to that section that the sponsor has no dialogue with. They are just creating content in that sector, say on the future of business.

We liken it to a baseball stadium where the sponsor comes in and acquires naming rights for, you know, 10 years. And it's the most expensive of the approaches, but it's also probably the most idealistic one, ‘cause there is an equal win for all three parties involved, if it's done well.

BOB GARFIELD:  I had a sickening experience recently, where I appeared on HuffPost Live, the Web TV version of Huffington Post, and the subject was car advertising, or something like that.

FEMALE HOST:  Today we’re continuing our conversation on luxury, and we're talking to some experts and veterans of the marketing and advertising world about reaching different audiences abroad. Joining us in our Google Hangout, we have Bob Garfield, author of Can’t Buy Me Like, and host of NPR’s On The Media and writer for Media Post, David Kiley, editor-in-chief of AOL Autos, Holly Pavlika, senior vice-president of strategy at Collective Bias. And back in the studio with me, we have our friend Jim Vurpillat, the  director of marketing for Cadillac, which is a partner of HuffPost Live and is, of course, a brand that is synonymous with luxury. It’s great to have you all here.
  [END CLIP]

BOB GARFIELD:  It turns out that Cadillac was the sponsor of this piece. It was agreed beforehand that Cadillac would have its people on the piece and that Cadillac cars would be featured within it. And I've been sucked into that dynamic, and it was – uh sickening.

STEVE RUBEL:  All the more reason why having this discussion around ethics is important. It's a matter of just being very clear all around, all sides, not the least of which is the audience, in what is - in what is happening and where and why.

BOB GARFIELD:  So it is all murky but, still and all, you recommend some primary best practices. What are they?

STEVE RUBEL:  So there’s a set of ideals that relate to the creation of the content, the transparency around that and also the process, for people to consider that are mostly for us. We are going to prefer to work with companies that kind of err on the side of disclosure and are really upfront in what is taking place and why. And the media companies, the sales side and the editorial side are very separated. We are going to separate the parts of our business, so we’re going to make sure that people who are working with journalists day-to-day are not also negotiating paid media buys.

BOB GARFIELD:  “Ideals” is a pretty good word because [LAUGHS] they take place in an ideal world. At this moment in the history of native advertising, if you’ll forgive me, the best practices that you’ve promulgated sound to me kind of like pieties that ignore the inherent structural problem [LAUGHS] of advertorial, which, by its very nature, is first trying to exploit borrowed interest from the, the surrounding editorial, you know, a halo effect that it may in no way deserve, and, and, at worst, just  try to trick the reader. You talk about labeling. That is such a classic example of why this may be an insoluble problem.

On the one hand, the marketers want as little labeling as possible, because otherwise people, as you say, skip over the material. And the media are conflicted because they want to accommodate the [LAUGHS] marketers and make the sale. And, therefore, they use just enough disclosure to offer sort of plausible deniability but still make it very easy for readers to be confused, to trick them, in effect. Are, are these problems that can be solved?

STEVE RUBEL:  They have to be solved because the media has no other means to monetize right now. I don't think that this is something that they’re running to because they are excited about it. I think they're running to it because they feel that they need to offset those other financial pressures. And there’s also a cost pressure for them too, is they have to continue to build out for new platforms, like social networks, for example, and mobile that they didn’t have to build out before.
So the solving of this issue is primarily a publisher problem. But we believe that marketers and the public need to also be equal parties to this discussion, because what we all want to see is a viable press that continues to do what it's done for hundreds of years, but maybe finds a way to borrow the best of what has worked on social networks and search engines, as the business model. People there seem to know that those kinds of ads are what's required to support a free service. I feel like it's in everybody's best interest to somehow make this work, if we want to see a, a viable free press.
  [MUSIC UP & UNDER]

BOB GARFIELD:  Steve, thank you very much.

STEVE RUBEL:  Thank you, Bob.

BOB GARFIELD:  Steve Rubel is chief content strategist at the global PR firm, Edelman.

If you are interested in learning more about the evolution of paid and earned media, please contact Katie Gaskin at Katie.Gaskin@edelman.com

The Lines are Blurring


Bookmark and ShareBy Helen Vollmer, President, Edelman Southwest

As I watch the morning news while getting dressed I disgustedly ask myself is this really news or is the network just promoting its next reality show?  As I wait for my mani/pedi to dry, I find myself thumbing through a magazine article on what I think is an article on vitamins and nutrition only to realize, “wait, this is an advertising section.”   As I check my friends’ Tweets in the evening before going to bed, I spy a rainbow Oreo that is creating a firestorm of dialogue and I think to myself, what a smart advertising ploy!

Even for those of us in the business, it’s getting more difficult (at the risk of really dating myself) to know “Is it real or is it Memorex?” This, of course, begs the question of transparency and ethics in the ever-blossoming world of public seduction by savvy marketers.  Listen, I don’t have the answers here - after all I am a marketer who is always looking for new ways my clients can effectively communicate.  But I do know that whatever you call it—paid media, branded content, native advertising - there is a responsible, transparent way of handling sponsored content  so the world  really does understand what is news, what is opinion and what is advertising.  Our job as communicators is to make sure there is clarity in a complex world, not to muck it up so it’s impossible to make an informed decision about what to buy, believe, or even fear. 


So, enjoy this issue of eVolution, where our authors explore this topic from Scientology to Snowden.  Let us know how you’re navigating these muddy waters.  Or, if you’re just diving in to figure it out.